"Patriotism is a kind of religion; it is the egg from which wars are hatched." ~ Guy de Maupassant
Drug Testing of Legislators
Submitted by Melinda L. Secor on Sun, 2012-01-29 02:00
"Rep. Dvorak’s amendment to Rep. McMillin’s HB 1007 passed during second reading by a vote of 54 – 41 (with 4 excused and 1 not voting). It is an amendment to HB 1007 which provides for a test program whereby welfare recipients would be required to submit to and pass drug tests as a condition to receiving public benefits."
0
Your rating: None
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
17 hours 21 min ago
-
1 day 5 hours ago
-
2 days 2 hours ago
-
2 days 3 hours ago
-
2 days 4 hours ago
-
2 days 7 hours ago
-
3 days 14 hours ago
-
4 days 16 hours ago
-
5 days 9 hours ago
-
5 days 13 hours ago
Root Strikers
Supporters
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: The Voluntary Voice (Book Review #4) http://t.co/6QCn3oykFR
1 day 17 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: Dante’s Divine Comedy and the Divine Origins of the Free Market http://t.co/jW0qF12WRc
4 days 17 hours ago
- 1 of 41
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
About a decade ago when I lived in WA the idea was floated in the state leg that high school grads should have to take a test that would indicate "objectively" [sic] what they really knew or had competence of and that the test scores would be put on the grad's diploma for all the world to peruse. Then some suggested that the members of the state leg should have to take this test also and have their scores next to their line on the ballot. Heh. The enthusiasm for mandatory tests with published scores idea quickly faded. More to the point I think it would be a great idea to have not just politicians but cops, bureaucrats, military types, and all corporate bail-out recipients take and have published drug and alcohol tests. Corporate welfare recipients are just as worthy of that sort of scrutiny as the single mom who gets food stamps, eh? We could call it the "What's in your bloodstream?"Act modeled after the Capital One credit card ads ("What's in your wallet?"). Fair is fair, eh? Why should one group of welfare recipients be singled out for humiliation but not the others?