"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, no matter what name it is called." ~ John Stuart Mill
Misdefining Liberty
Submitted by Michael Kleen on Fri, 2011-04-29 03:00
The definitions of liberty devised in ivory towers and elsewhere have a profound impact on political and judicial thinking. Regardless of how wrongheaded some concepts of liberty prevalent early last century may now appear, America’s legal structure is now based on those ideas.
0
Your rating: None
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
10 hours 34 min ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
6 days 1 hour ago
-
6 days 22 hours ago
-
6 days 23 hours ago
-
1 week 8 min ago
-
1 week 3 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
Root Strikers
Supporters
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: The Voluntary Voice (Book Review #4) http://t.co/6QCn3oykFR
6 days 13 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: Dante’s Divine Comedy and the Divine Origins of the Free Market http://t.co/jW0qF12WRc
1 week 2 days ago
- 1 of 41
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
"...through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you..." ~ Peter
"When words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty." ~ Confucius (c.500 B.C.)
A Final Word of Caution
The language of the law is ever-changing as the courts, Congress, state legislatures, and administrative agencies continue to define, redefine and expand legal words and terms. Furthermore, many legal terms are subject to variations from state to state and again can differ under federal laws. Also the type of legal issue, dispute, or transaction involved can affect a given definition usage...
That means that the entire language of man’s so-called law, often called "legalese[1]", is built upon "shifting sand", and what are we told about the foolish man who built his house upon sand? "...it fell: and great was the fall of it."
_____________________________________________________________________________
[1] le·gal·ese (lē′gəl ēz′) - noun - the conventional language of legal forms, documents, etc., involving special vocabulary and formulations, often thought of as abstruse and incomprehensible to the layman
Note: It is not only "incomprehensible to the layman", but it is even incomprehensible to your lawmakers, so much so that they can no longer write their own laws.