"Patriotism is a kind of religion; it is the egg from which wars are hatched." ~ Guy de Maupassant
Redefining Marriage By Getting Rid of It?
Submitted by Jad Davis on Mon, 2011-03-14 03:00
"If the government no longer marries people, it cannot control who can and can’t get married, so the argument about gay marriage becomes irrelevant–the legal rights and protections of 'marriage' are no longer at stake."
0
Your rating: None
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
2 days 19 hours ago
-
3 days 8 hours ago
-
4 days 4 hours ago
-
4 days 6 hours ago
-
4 days 6 hours ago
-
4 days 10 hours ago
-
5 days 17 hours ago
-
6 days 18 hours ago
-
1 week 11 hours ago
-
1 week 15 hours ago
Root Strikers
Supporters
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: The Voluntary Voice (Book Review #4) http://t.co/6QCn3oykFR
3 days 19 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: Dante’s Divine Comedy and the Divine Origins of the Free Market http://t.co/jW0qF12WRc
6 days 19 hours ago
- 1 of 41
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
Did anyone bother to go read HB569? They aren't "getting rid" of marriage, fercrisesake, they are simply renaming it, "domestic union", (A domestic union contracted under this chapter shall be the legal equivalent to marriage....), to side-step "the argument about gay marriage", nothing more. Well, whoopdeefrikindo! That means that the STATE will still be the 3rd and controlling party (god) in your "domestic union".