"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." ~ H.L. Mencken
Why Limit PAD to the Terminally Ill?
Submitted by Bradley Keyes on Fri, 2013-03-22 00:00
"While catching up on the recent Cato Unbound conversations, I just read through Howard Ball’s lead essay and Philip Nitschke’s response about physician assisted death. Ball argues that a terminally ill patient’s interest in autonomy or the alleviation of suffering can justify granting her legal access to deadly drugs. In these cases, Ball claims that medical practitioners can permissibly write prescriptions for deadly drugs as well, but he confines his argument to the terminally ill."
0
Your rating: None
- Login to post comments
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
No real surprise.1 week 2 days ago
-
https://gx2527leftinvietnam.com/2 weeks 2 days ago
-
https://www.infowars.com/posts/alert-col-macgregor-warns-dem...6 weeks 20 hours ago
-
And of course, both of the author/commentators are Jews. No...6 weeks 3 days ago
-
Surprised to see Switzerland at only 32/100. Would've be...7 weeks 6 days ago
-
https://www.infowars.com/posts/johns-hopkins-says-gun-contro...12 weeks 3 days ago
-
An early Christmas present, it seems -- here, some 17 years...16 weeks 4 days ago
-
Never Forget Building 7: https://www.infowars.com/pos...31 weeks 2 days ago
-
Straight out of the communist playbook, as per Saul Alinsky...50 weeks 1 day ago
-
It's certainly a step in the right direction.1 year 5 weeks ago
more