"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." ~ H.L. Mencken
Recapping STR in Defense of Vermont Gun Freedoms
To: Rebecca Balint, Jeanette White, and Emily Long:
As I am unable to attend Tuesday's scheduled event in Montpelier, I thought to write all of you in advance with regard to my position on S. 6. And let's be candid right from the outset:
* It is one more in a series of relentless and unending Bloomberg-funded attempts to begin the process of dismantling Vermont's long-standing tradition of unimpeded gun freedom -- even though VT is ranked as THE safest place in America. Even though Vermonters have consistently and repeatedly shown we DO NOT WANT more gun laws. Even though Phil Scott -- not Sue Minter -- was elected governor.
* It will do NOTHING to fight or stop crime. You already KNOW this.
* UBCs/S.6 can ONLY be implemented if a gun registry is also implemented. The very first step -- ALWAYS -- in eliminating gun ownership altogether. And you know THAT, too.
I have nothing further to say. I would like to think you will oppose S.6, but I already know you won't. To not do so would be to turn your back on both the agenda and dogma of leftist thinking -- which none of you are about to do.
In closing, this 2015 essay was directed towards Ms. Balint, but the principles apply equally to all of you:
http://strike-the-root.com/change-youll-have-to-do-better-becca
Most Sincerely,
Alex Knight
(Town)
(Phone number)
- Login to post comments
- Alex R. Knight III's blog
Comments
It's a fine and concise communication, Alex, and I wish you luck. Good to see there may be at least one of your formerly Libertarian principles still intact.
It presents utilitarian arguments. Although good, I suggest those are inferior to the one endorsed by the new President; that gun rights are natural rights which, in Amendment 2, the Feds have sworn not to abridge.
Does the US Constitution bind the State of Vermont? - maybe not, by Amendment 10. But the Vermont one, in Chapter 1 Article 16, says much the same thing.
All that is paper, which Pols routinely ignore. Until government is eliminated, natural rights will be relentlessly eroded. But then - I nearly forgot - you no longer believe in rights anyway.