The Year Ahead: 2010

 Exclusive to STR

"'A lot more people were living on the edge than we ever even anticipated,' Haynes said. 'So many people were just barely making it. It's absolutely shocking.'"
~ Hospitality House spokesman Barry Frost, quoted in Economy Creates Newly Homeless by Kimberly Edds, OC Register, December 11, 2009
"There is no normality and no recovery. You cannot spend your way into recovery. It just doesn’t work. Look at the 1930s. It didn’t work then and it won’t work now. Government guarantees challenge reality and reality always wins. As a result of Fed policy we have corporatist fascism at its worst. Day by day we attract less foreign capital and that is because any semblance of free markets are gone. All the Fed has done is rescue its owners and other connected elitists and such a plan is doomed to failure."
- 1 -
The Illusion of Normalcy Fades to Black
I wrote the first of these "Year Ahead" columns two years ago because I expected the coming collapse (described earlier in Destruction by Paradigm, March 2007) to begin in earnest during 2008. I saw epic debt levels, massive monetary inflation (not just in the U.S. but on a global scale for the first time in history), resource depletion (especially for oil, metals, and fresh water), government encroachment into almost every area of life, growing levels of corruption in and out of government, pollution of both freshwater sources and the oceans, and a host of other problems coalescing into an unprecedented storm – a dark tipping point poised to bring poverty, tyranny, hunger, and homelessness to millions of formerly middle class families. Just saying that out loud sounds extreme – things couldn't get that bad, could they? – but in fact that much has already happened and the storm has just begun.
Both the mainstream media (including their favored "experts" and commentators) and the general public saw things differently two years ago – and still do. Businessweek ran a story on December 29, 2009 titled U.S. Economy: Confidence Rises as Consumers See Brighter Future, which suggests (to me) that the combination of reinflation by the Fed (i.e., massive monetary creation) and its immediate effects – partial reinflation of stock prices and a slowing (in some places, a slight reversal) of the ongoing real estate crash – plus the constant assertion in the media that the worst is over – have worked their magic. Americans don't see the job picture improving much anytime soon (and they're right), but they have more confidence than they did a few months ago.
The Frankenstein Economy
That will change in the coming year, as the Frankenstein economy – long-dead but artificially reanimated using bizarre, harmful, and unsustainable means – goes into cardiac arrest. Propaganda, denial, and fiat money creation can only do so much, and as the old world crumbles, it will become ever-harder to sustain the illusion of normalcy.
Consider what we've already been through: Roughly $60 trillion in wealth evaporated in 2008 as stocks crashed, real estate prices tumbled, and huge banks and other financial institutions failed (including Lehman Brothers – the largest bankruptcy in history up to that time [edit 1/8/2010: actually, it's STILL the largest] – and the insolvent Bear Stearns, sold to J.P. Morgan for $2/share, down from $172/share in early 2007). A sobering 2.6 million American jobs disappeared in 2008, even using the heavily-massaged official numbers. shows a current unemployment rate of 22% versus the official rate of about 10% – see chart below, which also makes clear that unemployment continues to worsen, and very dramatically.

In my second Year Ahead column, I quoted Kurt Kasun on the disaster of 2008, who pointed out (in Not Your Grandfather's Depression) that "This is beyond rescue. It is virtually impossible to overstate the dire consequences resulting from the severity of the declines recently experienced in almost all asset classes – from both a technical and fundamental viewpoint." 
Kasun did not believe the worst was over, and neither did I. The collapse continued and indeed, 2009 has been even worse in many ways. GM and Chrysler went bankrupt, job losses continued to mount (again, see chart above), the national debt grew higher than ever and is rocketing higher-still, the real estate meltdown continued, and – per Ringo's Law – everything the government has done to "help" with this ongoing disaster has made things worse, to the point where avoiding a serious, long-lasting depression is now, I believe, impossible, even if we were to start doing everything right – and how likely is that?
The Worst Decade in History for Stocks
Despite the boom years of mid-decade (the "housing bubble years," more accurately), the disasters of '08 and '09 have made the last ten years the worst decade for the U.S. stock market in its 200 year history, per the Wall Street Journal. Not even the Great Depression was as bad for stocks as the 2000s have been. This is despite the market being up dramatically for the year so far, at least in nominal terms, although still well below its former highs.
Nominal Value Versus Real Value
I said the stock market is up "in nominal terms" because as the dollar drops in value, the Dow and other investments must "run faster just to stay in place" – if the dollar loses 50% of its value in a period of time, then your investments and income have to double just to maintain their buying power, and that assumes no tax consequences from the nominal doubling in dollar value. Since there usually are tax consequences, you'd actually need your investments and income to more than double to maintain buying power. The Zimbabwe stock exchange is a good example; as the Zimbabwe currency was being inflated into worthlessness and national unemployment was hitting 80%, the Zimbabwe stock market was doing great – when priced in the local currency. John Paul Koning describes the phenomenon in an article for which includes this chart:

 Zimbabwe: Best Performing Stock Market in 2007?

Hoo-boy! Stock market nirvana! What a boom! The chart makes it appear that Zimbabwe investors were richer than Croesus, richer than Bill Gates, richer than Saudi princes. The reality was quite different.
As recently as 1980, the Zimbabwe dollar was worth more than the U.S. dollar, but by January 2009, Zimbabwe had degraded its money to the point where it was forced to issue a $100 Trillion bill – see image below – that was worth "about $30" per the BBC. Many people in Zimbabwe were trillionaires, but most were still poverty-stricken and hungry.


 Image from a post by Ron Hera at

Is the U.S. dollar headed into hyperinflationary Zimbabweland? You be the judge: Below is another chart from, in this case from Monetary Base by Briggs Armstrong. The resemblance to the chart above is – well, probably just a coincidence. America is NOT Zimbabwe, after all. America is special, and such things can't happen here.


 Monetary base for the U.S

Inflation by the Fed may keep the Dow and other stock exchanges moving higher, which nearly everyone will interpret as meaning "things are getting better." Yet the Zimbabwe experience (and others like it throughout history) shows that nominal investment values can rise to the stratosphere even as an economy is dying and people are starving.
Because today EVERY major currency on Earth is a fiat currency, similar problems afflict every nation. Mostly for this reason, the dollar will periodically gain in strength versus other benchmark fiat currencies and at times even against gold and commodity goods. Such moves are the normal zigs and zags of market activity; things seldom go up or down in a straight line. The long-term trend is clear: all fiat currencies are being inflated (as fiat currencies always have been in history) and are thus losing value over time. While it is theoretically possible for the U.S. to stop creating new dollars via the Fed, the result would be a complete inability of the U.S. to pay its bills, including – soon – even just the interest on the federal debt (see later in this essay). Foreigners are no longer very interested in buying more U.S. debt to fund our deficits and our wars, so even "borrowing" means creating money by the Fed to buy Treasuries with (called monetizing the debt, and not something the Fed or the government admits to, but evidence is strong that this is happening).
- 2 -
The 2010 Economy
As for the near-term economic outlook, we can demolish the happy-face mainstream "green shoots" nonsense right now with a single chart (no, not the "22% unemployment" chart above, or the eye-popping chart of our exploding monetary base, although either should have done the job all by itself). Versions of the chart below have been featured in many articles recently; this one is from The Second Wave of Mortgage Defaults by the folks at the Daily Reckoning:

Clearly, the real estate disaster is far from over (and we haven't even mentioned commercial real estate – another looming horror story – or the disappearance of home equity credit lines or the real estate implosion in Dubai, with effects that go far beyond the Middle East). We are merely in the eye of the storm; the next wave of defaults is already locked into place. BusinessWeek has called option ARMs (the massive tan-colored lump underlying the spike on the right side of the graph) "Nightmare Mortgages" and says "The option adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) might be the riskiest and most complicated home loan product ever created." As the chart above suggests, such mortgages have become very popular; for example, the San Francisco Chronicle reports that the Bay Area alone has almost $31 billion of option ARMs waiting to reset. Nearly 20% of all home loans in the SF Bay area during 2004 – 2008 were option ARMS, and more than 27% of those loans are already "60-plus days delinquent or in foreclosure." In some nearby counties, the numbers are significantly worse.

Bottom line: bad as the sub-prime disaster was (it crashed major banks and investment firms, helped crash Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – which were in essence taken over by the federal government – and kicked off a worldwide financial crash of historic proportions), the option ARM disaster will be worse – especially since the banks, the overall financial system, most businesses large and small, governments at local, state, and federal levels, and typical American families are in far worse shape than they were two years ago before the storm began. For instance, government revenue is down while demand for many government services – especially safety-net services, from food programs to unemployment benefits – is up. The result is predictable:
"Nationally, 35 states and Puerto Rico expect to have $56 billion less next year than they will need to pay for all of their programs, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In Nevada, Arizona and New Jersey, the difference amounts to more than one-quarter of their budgets, the conference said. Funds from the $787 billion federal stimulus bill passed in February run out at the end of next year."
That last sentence suggests the pain will continue into 2011 and beyond, and with the government using more of what caused our economic problems (over-spending, over-printing of money, over-regulation of the economy, etc.) to supposedly fix the problems, that seems a good bet.
Tax Receipt Shortfalls Highlight the Truth
California and other states are hoping for bailouts from the federal government, but the feds have their own money problems. These tax-receipt shortfalls – at all levels of government – are another proof that the economy is still in crisis. Commentator Jim Willie points out that "Receipts have fallen from $2,600 billion to almost $2,000 billion in the last two plus years. They have fallen and cannot get up. In fact they contradict any lunatic notion of a jobs picture improvement. The November Jobs Report was a pure fiction." [Bold added] He reproduces a fairly stunning chart from Casey Research showing the precipitous drop in federal receipts, the equally precipitous rise in outlays, and the resulting gone-vertical deficit spending rise: 

For another way to see the ongoing train wreck of job loss in America, here's a sobering, animated map of the county-by-county rise in the unemployment rate 2007 – 2009. In about 29 seconds of running time, this short animation clears up any confusion about how things are really going in the U.S. economy. In plain language, the economy is falling off a cliff.

Does the Data Support a Recovery in 2010?
Will things improve as the option ARM hurricane gets underway? Will American consumers (who used to be "citizens") start spending again despite not having jobs? Will homeowners find replacements for the home equity loans that let them maintain spending levels during the real estate bubble? Will the unemployed be buying iPods (or food, for that matter) when the states run out of money for unemployment benefits? Will increased competition for oil, food, and other resources from growing economies and growing populations in Asia somehow fail to push prices up in the West? Will the stunning debt levels in this country, from the federal government down to state, county, and local governments, from General Motors down to one-person shops, and from Donald Trump down to the Little People like you and me – will all that crushing, suffocating debt somehow NOT impede our economic recovery? Are better times just around the corner, as we hear so often in the lamebrain media?
Don't count on it. Bert Dohmen sums it up this way in Forbes (Trillions Of Troubles Ahead, December 18, 2009), and note that he is only discussing one of the issues raised above:
"The world has not seen such debt levels in modern history. This debt is not serviceable. Imagine that total debt is 557% of GDP [as Dohmen documents that it is], without considering entitlements. [Bold added, because – well, read those last three words again . . .] The interest on the debt will consume all the tax revenues of the country in the not-too-distant future. [Again, bold added] Then there will be no way out but to create more debt in order to finance the old debt.
"It assures a period of economic devastation. In a last, desperate attempt, politicians at the federal and local levels will raise taxes to astronomical heights to raise revenues. And that only assures destruction of the economy. Forget the fable of economic recovery. Unless there is a change [ha!] in Washington by next year's election, there will be no way to turn back."
That sounds grim, but it's not grim enough. There is already "no way to turn back." That time is over. Economist John Williams of says flatly that we have passed the point of no return; for the scariest 30 minute interview (mp3 audio) you've probably ever heard, click here for Williams explaining why there is no way to fix the current situation: the system is going to crash, "no more than five years down the road" and probably sooner. Williams sees Zimbabwe-style hyperinflation coming, where the U.S. dollar becomes worth less than a sheet of toilet paper. The word "panic" is used more than once. (One of Williams' practical tips: hoard those little airline bottles of scotch or vodka for change and for small purchases after barter has replaced the current financial system).
Most Americans will not believe that hyperinflation is possible in the United States until it is already underway, but Williams (among other experts and informed commentators who I respect) insists that hyperinflation is now inevitable. Hyperinflation has happened many times in history and the Fed is hyperinflating the U.S. money supply as you read this. Also note that the corrupt authorities, news sources, and commentators most Americans rely on have been consistently wrong about nearly everything related to the economy for years – they didn't foresee the dot-com bubble and crash, the housing bubble and crash, the swooning stock market of the last ten years, the roughly four-fold rise in gold prices during the same period, or the massive stock market crash and financial industry implosion of 2008, for just a few examples. In light of all that, I strongly suggest readers give serious consideration to Williams' predictions. If America went through a crash similar to the fall of the Soviet Union, or suffered hyperinflationary economic destruction on par with Zimbabwe's or the Weimar Republic's – what would you do? What would you want to have already done before the SHTF?
- 3 -
Shortages and Rising Prices for Food, Water, Oil, and Imported Goods
Food: About 37.2 million Americans are now receiving food stamps (although the food stamp program was recently renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP). In a nation of 308,200,917 souls (as of 12/21/2009, per the Census Bureau), that's about 12% of the entire population unable to feed itself without help. The number of people on food assistance is up 18% for the year and up 35% since 2007.
This would clearly be a bad time for a major food shortage (which would raise prices, among other things), and the official word is: We don't have to worry about one. Then again, for those who haven't been paying attention, the official word is often wrong.
In 2010 Food Crisis for Dummies, Eric deCarbonnel makes the case that the official USDA forecasts for the coming year are wrong – far more optimistic than on-the-ground information warrants. Also, current production is lower than the USDA is reporting. That's even worse that it sounds because it means that "instead of adjusting production estimates down to reflect decreased production, [the USDA] adjusted estimates upwards to match increasing demand from china [sic]. In this way, the USDA has brought supply and demand back into balance (on paper) and temporarily delayed a rise in food prices by ensuring a catastrophe in 2010." [Bold added]
Why would misreporting by the USDA ensure a catastrophe in 2010? By corrupting the information function of the market. Higher prices (which we should be seeing, and would be seeing if it was widely known that a shortfall was coming) would encourage lower consumption, which in turn would leave more foodstocks in reserve for the lean time to come. Instead, the USDA's overblown production figures create artificially low prices today which lead to over-consumption, leaving less food in reserve for the coming year – which would be very lean even if the world wasn't over-consuming food today. Because we are consuming more than we would be if we had accurate information, tomorrow's shortfall will be much worse than it would otherwise be.
2009 itself was not a good year for foodstocks, and deCarbonnel is not the only person concerned about the problem. In Why Britain Faces a Bleak Future of Food Shortages, the Guardian quotes Britain's chief scientist, John Beddington, as calling the problems of water scarcity and food shortages "a perfect storm" that will cause severe problems around the world. The growing world population is also a major issue: "We are going to have to produce as much food in the next 50 years as was produced over the past 5,000 years," says Professor Mike Bevan.
Science and a relatively free market averted mass famine in the ‘70s and ‘80s with the Green Revolution; the question is whether that feat can be repeated, especially with less-free markets, bio-fuel mandates crowding out food crops, restrictions on greenhouse gases and other government-imposed handicaps, and shortages of water, oil, arable land, and fertilizer. Increasing numbers of people think the answer will be "no."
Are deCarbonnel and others right about a food crisis just around the corner in 2010? (Or if not 2010, then another year in the near future?) We'll know soon enough. In the meantime, deCarbonnel's article in particular is worth reading; it includes a great deal of data I haven't seen elsewhere (and about more than just food) and does a good job of calling the official story into question for several reasons. If the shortfall is even half as bad as deCarbonnel expects, the number of Americans – and others around the world – who cannot afford to feed themselves could grow substantially.
The freshwater shortage is already a crisis in many places, and this ongoing problem will get substantially worse in coming years. I haven't seen anything to suggest a sudden worsening of the freshwater problem, but as population grows and freshwater sources are drained by over-use and polluted to dangerous levels, the steadily growing shortfall will become acute in more regions and eventually, at least in terms of side effects, even in areas that still have plentiful water supplies. Unlike oil, water cannot be replaced by other resources: Human beings and their crops and farm animals must have water to survive; water is also needed for manufacturing, for tar sand and other energy-source harvesting, and for many other uses. The knock-on effects of a global water shortage will impact the economy of every nation in addition to the more obvious and direct problems.
Two articles (of the hundreds available with a quick web search) that provide an overview of the issue:
Oil prices dropped from $147 per barrel into the low $30s in response to the financial crash of 2008 (at which point oil was still about three times more expensive than it had been in 1998 when oil averaged $11.91; for further historical perspective, oil was $1.37 in 1946). As I write this, is showing oil at $79.29 per barrel.
Four major forces will continue pushing the oil price higher in the coming years:
1.      Monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve
2.      Population growth – This is much more severe than most people think, and is a factor in higher prices for every commodity resource
3.      Economic and industrial growth in the East – which will increase both absolute and relative consumption levels in China and other fast-growing economies, putting even more pressure on the dollar price for oil (and food, and everything else)
4.      Peak oil
Evidence for the reality of peak oil continues to mount: new sources of oil will almost certainly not be sufficient to replace lost production in a timely fashion, and will be far more expensive than conventional sources in any case. See for charts and data on every oil producing nation, and note the downslopes for oil production in chart after chart; forecasts and "estimated reserves" may say otherwise, but actual data says the world has already peaked for oil production. is another good resource on the topic.
2010 may or may not see higher oil prices – another financial crash may bring enough demand destruction to forestall higher prices or even lower them again – but higher prices over the long term seem inevitable.
A recent scandal suggests that, as many have long believed, "the authorities" have known about, accepted, and been concerned about peak oil for years while lying to the public about it:
"The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying.
". . . Now the 'peak oil' theory is gaining support at the heart of the global energy establishment. . . .
"'Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further.'"
Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower by Terry Macalister, The Guardian,November 6, 2009
The story includes the chart below based on the now-suspect IEA data; note that even here, production for "currently producing fields" is falling off a cliff, while most of the oil that supposedly will replace lost production (plus fill increased future demand) is from "fields yet to be developed" and "fields yet to be found." Good luck with that, as they say.


Imported Goods

Each of the factors above also puts upward pressure on the prices of imported goods in America, but the biggest and most immediate problem for Wal-Mart shoppers (other than having lost their jobs and perhaps their unemployment benefits) will be that as the dollar drops in value, foreigners will want a LOT more of those worthless dollars for the goods they send us. (Wouldn't you?) Various factors – including both normal market efficiencies and the wholesale replacement of Western manufacturing by Chinese manufacturing – have kept price inflation somewhat in check for decades despite the Fed's monetary inflation, but those anti-inflation forces are about used up: the market isn't as "free" as it was even ten years ago (see Eric Janszen quote below) and there isn't much manufacturing left in America to outsource. That, plus various other factors, including especially the fed's recent shift into hyperdrive for monetary creation, ensure higher prices – soon.
"The U.S. economy is a madhouse of tax, regulatory, and monetary policies geared to special interests. To the Military Industrial Complex add the Banking Industrial Complex, Health Care Industrial Complex, Education Industrial Complex, Real Estate Industrial Complex, and on and on."
- 4 -
Three Predictions for 2010 and Beyond
Today I'll go out on a limb and predict three things:
First, that 2010 will follow in the new tradition of each year being worse than the one before, at least by most measures and for most Americans. Higher prices, even measured by the government's official CPI figures, will be one of the problems; ongoing job losses will be another. The torrent of foreclosures will continue and worsen before eventually (probably not in 2010) leveling off. Government services and safety nets will suffer just as they are needed most; the Baby Boomers are retiring just in time to learn the hard way that their Social Security and other "safety net" taxes were stolen by politicians and spent on war and other nonsense. With or without "health care reform," quality medical care will be harder to come by. The dollar may strengthen against other currencies or not (remember that other currencies are also fiat and are being inflated), but dollar debasement will continue. Confidence level: 95%.
Second, that America (and a great many other places, especially in the West) will not see a return to the high levels of prosperity we once took for granted – ever (confidence level: 80%). By "ever" I mean "in the lifetime of anyone reading these words," even if some of my readers live to be really, really old – wrinkly, stooped-over, shuffling-down-the-hall old. Actually, it might be "ever" as in "never to be seen again, even in a million years," but that's too far out for reasonably accurate prediction, so I'll just say it's a possibility (for reasons that should be clear from topics discussed in this column – dramatic global population growth, peak oil, and other "peak" resource problems – for water, metals, and more, and for reasons mostly related to runaway mal-tech and environmental issues) and leave it at that.
Third, that within the next few years – five or six at the outside, but possibly in 2010 itself – America will suffer a fall of such magnitude that this country will become almost unrecognizable. At some point the destruction of both our economy and our liberty will become so profound that a dramatic event, probably sudden rather than gradual, will occur and will mark the end of one phase in this nation's history and the beginning of another. Hyperinflation will be a major element in the tipping point (or possibly a sudden official devaluation, or replacement of the dollar with the Amero or some other new currency). Like the fall of the Soviet Union, this event will be clear and unmistakable, although its exact character will differ from the Soviet experience; for one thing, the Soviets were far better prepared for societal collapse than Americans are, in part because Soviet society had been in a state of near-collapse from Day One after the revolution of 1917 – collapse was not a new issue for Soviet citizens; they'd had 70 years to adapt. Americans have instead adapted to levels of prosperity never before seen in history, and the effects of a collapse on Americans, in general, will be horrific. Government response to the situation will make things worse, and will almost certainly be incredibly repressive. Confidence level for this third prediction: 65%.
I believe the data presented above (and much other available data) support such unsettling predictions all too well. Hard times are coming – and that's if things go as well as possible from here. Much worse is coming – much worse than another Great Depression – unless major, positive change begins soon, and so far I do not see that happening.
I hope I'm wrong, but I fear that I am not.
2010 and the years beyond look to be harsh times for love and freedom, as well as for the more tangible elements discussed in this column. That is especially troubling because, as I have written before (for instance in The Two Great Evils and the Hammer of Infinite Power), today may be the last chance for us to prevent a disaster that cannot be undone, such as a long-term or even permanent destruction of modern civilization, a hypertech-enabled tyranny, or even an extinction event for the human race. Rapidly-advancing twenty-first century technology, combined with environmental and other challenges, make such dangers all-too-real, as many scientists and others have pointed out.
It may not be too late, but it is certainly late in the game. If we are to salvage not only America as a reasonably free society but finally realize the idea of America – the idea of a civil and compassionate society where people are truly free from tyranny and from systematic injustice – then we must use the chaos that is coming to our advantage. We must find ways to replace the pro-tyranny "government is compassion" and "coercive government is necessary" memes with the truth: that love and freedom require each other, and that civil society requires especially that the young (pregnant mothers, newborns, infants, and children) be treated with compassion and respect.
Love and freedom are the cure – the only cure – for what ails us. We either begin to understand that and to apply it, or we, and our children and grandchildren, will suffer the consequences.


Your rating: None Average: 8.2 (5 votes)
Glen Allport's picture
Columns on STR: 111

Glen Allport co-authored The User's Guide to OS/2 from Compute! Books and is the author of The Paradise Paradigm: On Creating a World of Compassion, Freedom, and Prosperity.


Bill Ross's picture

When you get down to basics, Glen's points are consequences of choices (made / tolerated) that have increased the ratio of greed to productive economic activity far beyond fatal. In the eternal war between the greedy (those who consume more than they produce) and the productive (those who produce more than they consume), the greedy are winning. This is the root cause of the rise (honesty in control) and fall (predators in control) of civilizations. Easily proven:

Glen Allport's picture

I agree with you, Bill Ross [why do replies not attach to the comment being replied to? -- EDIT - hey, thanks Web guy, for fixing the problem. Quick service, too], and I enjoyed reading your math-based column again. The possibility that a large enough percentage of people will begin to see the truth and to act on it is what makes STR more than a pity party among a group heading for extinction, but I can't say I'm terribly optimistic. I do feel we each have an obligation to support the healthy, positive elements in life in whatever way seems right to us, but that isn't the same as saying I think civil society will prevail.

Bill Walker's picture

We aren't going to run out of food... even if the crops were halved, we could just eat more vegetables and less meat. We aren't going to run out of oil, either; check out the Shell plant in the Gulf that makes diesel out of natural gas for $25 a barrel. Nor are we going to run out of uranium or thorium... though only the Chinese may be allowed to build nuclear plants.

Of course if the US keeps giving a couple trillion to bankers and blowing another trillion on foreign adventures every year, we may not be able to BUY any food. But there will be plenty around.

Glen Allport's picture

Hi Bill Walker: I didn't say we would run out of food: I said we might have a food SHORTAGE that would raise prices (independently of other forces that raise prices, such as monetary inflation and global population growth). Evidence is strong that this is a real possibility in the next year or two, and in any case: there are many millions of people around the world who ALREADY cannot get enough food to prevent malnutrition and even starvation. When you live in a wealthy society and don't have such problems, it seems silly that shortages could be around the corner, but -- as I pointed out in the column -- more than 37 million in the US are already unable to feed themselves without assistance. I expect that number to grow, and if foodstocks are lower than expected, the shortage will contribute to higher prices. But yes: you, personally, will probably still be able to eat. As for me, I put in a garden last year, so I'm hopeful that I'll be able to eat also.

As for oil, here again I am not saying we'll "run out" of oil. There will be oil available a century from now; the question is whether new sources of oil will come online in a timely fashion and in sufficient quantity to satisfy demand in a world of rapidly-growing population and with huge nations (India and China, in particular) ramping up their use of oil so fast it makes your head spin. China -- where no one but Party bigshots had cars in the recent past -- is already a larger market for new cars than the US. [ ].

Individual examples of oil production in particular places are meaningless; the global oil supply is struggling to meet demand and even IF it can keep up over the next few years, new sources of oil are, on average, a LOT more expensive to harvest and to refine than oil has been in the past. Ergo, the expectation for higher prices (not to mention the forces of monetary inflation and population growth) and probably for shortages. Not "running out of oil", but shortages of oil. During the '73 oil embargo the shortfall of oil was a mere 5% compared to what we'd had available before the embargo, and the results were lines around the block for gasoline, 5-gallon limits at many stations, odd/even rationing (based on one's license plate number), and other annoyances. And, of course, a huge uptick in prices, a recession, higher unemployment, and so on. I was there; I remember.

golefevre's picture

What are you going to do, crawl up in a hole someplace and wait to die? This essay is so well researched, so valid that we can only say it confirms what we know to be intrinsically true, that the "world feels wrong" as Will Groves wrote here about a year ago. If your brother be damned, you love him no less--and we are damned together by the "will" of the "majority." So let it be said that there was fair warning, that there were a few like minds dissenting to the machinations of "modern" economics and that we went on living, preparing. Who can guess the end game of all of this? Certainly not me, but I think we can all agree it will not be pleasant. If I have faith, it is in our ingenuity and our willingness to trade with one another. Hold fast to an axiom: despite the threat of violence, despite man's laws, despite the "will" of the people it remains a fact that we cannot "make" each other conform to what we think is correct. At most, we can persuade and I think you make our case very well here Mr. Allport.

Glen Allport's picture

Thanks, golefevre (nice handle, btw). The possibility that the coming collapse and various other disasters will enlighten people about the dangers of coercive government and move them to better understand the importance of love and freedom in their lives is, to my mind, the ONLY positive we might see from the global fiat-currency meltdown and its attendant evils. I don't think our odds are good for a positive outcome, but the odds aren't zero, either.

Bill Walker's picture

>I said we might have a food SHORTAGE that would raise prices

I'm right with you there... all the economic damage we've suffered from inflation, bailouts, etc. is definitely going to make it harder for US to buy food, even if the crops were normal.

My problem when talking about "peak oil" is that ANY resource will die out under our current "system" of not letting anyone build anything (e.g. fission power plants). If the market prevails (and it will in China and India), our problem is going to be "peak oxygen", not peak oil ;)

Here's my old article "Googling For Oil":

(I would have called it "Googling For He-3", but I was afraid that would cause me to prematurely attain Nerdvana and lose my Techno-Bodhisattva status ;)

jjmonkeys's picture

Glenn, do you forsee pockets of stability based on some geographic areas having higher percentages of people who will be prepared to care for themselves withough federal government support? I'm referring to some rural areas and some areas where there are resources of international value that are grown, mined etc? Or will the federal government tax all businesses and resources out of viability.

Glen Allport's picture

Good question, and I don't think I have enough information to answer. Absent government intrusions, the answer would of course be "yes" -- there are plenty of areas where the people could take care of themselves, ride out the crisis, and maintain some level of civil society. Rural areas with small farms would be obvious candidates, and states or smaller areas with mining, oil, or other commodity wealth and the infrastructure to extract and/or refine and ship the products would also be more likely than average, I'd think, to do well. But as you suggest, the government response to this government-created [whether INTENTIONALLY or not] crisis is unknown. LOTS of things -- both historic examples and present day news and rumor -- suggest some very ugly actions by the feds, with skyrocketing taxes being among the lesser evils we might be subjected to. So far, the government response has largely been to steal breath-taking amounts of money from the citizens and hand it to bankers and other connected special interests. Actually reversing the damage and starting to solve the problem is NOT on the agenda. What will happen? What are the odds for various scenarios? Again, I don't have enough information to say anything definite. Personally, I expect large, crowded metro areas to be especially dangerous, but even THAT depends on the particulars of what happens. So good luck to us all, and here's hoping that the healthier, traditional American qualities -- self-reliance, fairness, respect for others (i.e., for their freedom), honesty, willingness to do real work, ingenuity, charity where appropriate, and so on -- carry the day and in the end, are strengthened. Plenty of forces are working for the extinction of such qualities, and I really think that too much is hidden from us right now (anybody think the dozens of alphabet agencies are being open and honest with us about their plans?) to even guess how things will work out.

White Refugee's picture


I was just curious if you had read Dmitry Orlov's post: Fits in nicely with yours, for what to expect, and a few ideas on planning.

Surviving Peak Oil & Economic Collapse: Post-Soviet Lessons for a Post-American Century, by Dmitry Orlov

Glen Allport's picture

I've read some of his stuff, and indeed the idea that Americans will NOT do as well with a collapse as the Russians did is something I first saw in an interview with Orlov. Like many unsettling predictions, its an obvious point but we don't tend to think in that direction, meaning that most of us expect "normal" life in the US to continue, with minor changes over time and short ups and downs from the business cycle.

Something much more severe is coming to a head, though, and this fact has begun to filter into more and more people's awareness. The first week or two of this year has already seen a large number of very scary predictions and commentary. Two examples:

Willem Buiter [former Bank of England policymaker] warns of massive dollar collapse


Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. on the Failure of the Public Sector, the Coming Military Crackdown and What Can Be Done to Stop It

As for planning: the first thing is to understand the underlying forces and dynamics in play, and then apply that understanding to your own personal situation, including your resources, weaknesses, preferences, and so on. Fiat currency always dies; the entire world is using fiat currency today -- and the end-game for all of those currencies is very near. The dollar is now worth so little compared to its historic "1/20 oz of gold" that each dollar now has about the purchasing power of a PENNY (or two) in my grandfather's day. Combine that with mega-trillion dollar deficits, $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, a dismantled manufacturing infrastructure and a largely centrally-controlled market for most things, and -- well, all the rest; you know the story as well as I do -- and SOMETHING big is coming.

Be ready for that. How? Move overseas, maybe. Put in a large garden, maybe. Stock up on staples and goods for bartering. My personal situation is not the same as yours, and I am reluctant to suggest anyone else do what I think is right -- it might NOT be right, even for me, not to mention for you. But if you will look the future in the eye and see what today's information is telling you about tomorrow, you'll know what to do. It won't be easy, or cheap, or pleasant, so you'll want to not see it. Try to get past that and see things clearly -- that's the best advice I think I can give anyone.